GFS Platform

Process flows

Process flow charts

Process flows

Inline diagrams

Archify diagrams

NS workflows

Suitelets

Reading these

Each flow has an inline SVG diagram (renders in any browser, no external dependencies) plus the Mermaid source if you want to render it elsewhere. Two flows have richer Archify diagrams linked inline.

Order-to-Cash (O2C)

Standard order lifecycle. Lead → quote → SO → production (WO + Assembly Build) → fulfillment → invoicing → payment. Credit memos branch from invoice.

Open interactive Archify diagram →

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  L[Lead] --> Q[Quote]
  Q --> SO[Sales Order]
  SO --> WO[Work Order]
  WO --> AB[Assembly Build]
  AB --> IF[Fulfillment]
  IF --> INV[Invoice]
  INV --> CP[Payment]
  CP --> CM[Credit Memo]

Records / D1 tables: transactions, so_lines, invoice_lines, customers, items

Procure-to-Pay (P2P)

Procurement lifecycle. PR → PO → IR (3-way match input) → VB → VP / Check. 22,911 vendor bills in D1.

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  PR[Purchase Request] --> PO[Purchase Order]
  PO --> IR[Item Receipt]
  IR --> VB[Vendor Bill]
  VB --> VP[Vendor Payment]
  VP --> CHK[Check]

Records / D1 tables: transactions, vb_lines, vendors, items

Inventory & Work Orders

Production and warehouse. WO drives Assembly Build, which consumes raw items via IR and outputs finished goods.

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  WO[Work Order] --> AB[Assembly Build]
  AB --> IADJ[Inv Adjustment]
  IT[Inv Transfer] --> WS[Inv Worksheet]
  IR[Item Receipt] --> AB
  AB --> UNBLD[Assembly Unbuild]
  UNBLD --> IADJ

Records / D1 tables: transactions, items, ref_location

Pricing Management

Customer-specific pricing flow. 1,264 customer_pricing rows in D1. Stale prices flagged via the 'Outdated Customer Pricing' saved search.

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  REQ[Pricing Request] --> REV[Customer Pricing Review]
  REV --> APP[Approval]
  APP --> CP[customer_pricing update]
  CP --> SOP[SO pulls pricing]
  PGT[Prices Good Through] --> EXP[Stale alert]

Records / D1 tables: customer_pricing, customers, items

Collections & Dunning

Dual dunning: Customer-level + Invoice-level + Invoice Group-level. 18 workflows + 8 dunning email templates.

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  INV[Open Invoice] --> AGE[Aging > threshold]
  AGE --> EVAL[Dunning Eval]
  EVAL --> PA[Procedure Assign]
  PA --> EM[Email Send]
  EM --> CLR[Clear after 7d]
  GRP[Group Eval] --> PA

Records / D1 tables: transactions (CustInvc), customers, dunningprocedure

Financial Close

Period close. All 154 periods (FY2018-FY2026) currently OPEN per audit — undermines comparative reporting. Tier 1 GAP.

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  TX[Transactions all 20 types] --> POST[Post to Period]
  POST --> REC[Reconciliation]
  REC --> ADJ[Adjusting JEs]
  ADJ --> CLS[Close Period]
  CLS --> RPT[Financial Statements]

Records / D1 tables: transactions, gl_accounts, AccountingPeriod

NetSuite → D1 sync

Current sync path. Single-laptop dependency — #1 SPOF in the blueprint. Remediation: Worker scheduled() handler calling SuiteAPI directly.

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  NS[NetSuite 4656898] --> SAPI[SuiteAPI 2948]
  SAPI --> CHRT[Chartstone Pro]
  CHRT --> SYNC[sync.sh every 15m]
  SYNC --> WRG[wrangler d1 execute]
  WRG --> D1[D1 transactions]
  D1 --> WK[Worker]
  WK --> API[REST endpoints]

Records / D1 tables: transactions, ref_*, sync_log

System architecture

Full architecture across NS, local sync layer, and Cloudflare. Interactive Archify version has dark/light toggle and PNG/SVG export.

Open interactive Archify diagram →

Mermaid source

flowchart LR
  NS[NetSuite] --> SAPI[SuiteAPI]
  SAPI --> CHRT[Chartstone]
  CHRT --> SYNC[sync.sh]
  SYNC --> D1[D1]
  D1 --> WK[Worker]
  KV[KV] --> WK
  R2[R2] --> WK
  WK --> API[api.ai-...]
  PG[Pages] --> WEB[UI]

Records / D1 tables: all